“We live in the midst of invisible forces whose effects alone we perceive. We move among invisible forms whose actions we very often do not perceive at all, though we may be profoundly affected by them.” – Dion Fortune
I was recently asked by several people to comment on the political assassination of conservative Christian social commentator Charlie Kirk. While a more detailed analysis is required, I’ll point out the following and leave it to the reader to consider the points made and what it means to them as a practitioner of esoteric disciplines.
What we know: Charlie Kirk was shot dead at a rally in front of thousands of people and his family.
What we don’t know: We do not know much more than that simple fact. We are told a great deal. We can even very rationally surmise a great deal for a host of reasons, but that is not something we know. It is something we believe or are presenting as conjecture.
What we know: The response to Kirk’s death worldwide was staggering. He, along with the murdered Ukrainian woman, Iryna Zarutska a day earlier, have become not only martyrs but secular saints of sorts for a variety of populist and religious causes – again, worldwide.
What we don’t know: What the long-term reactions to this vast reservoir of psychic power is going to be.
What we know: Two days prior to Kirk’s murder an editor at the leftist online publications Jezebel published an article (since removed from their website) on how she hired a witch from an Etsy listing to curse Charlie Kirk. They insisted it was all in good fun and meant no harm.
Why this matters: For over ten years the “spiritual community” has been increasingly infested with neo-pagans, witches, and some variations of Buddhist converts and magicians who have advocated the use of malefic magic for their specifically “progressive” political ends. This includes publishers as well as authors, and as I have stated repeatedly, it is interesting to see how the neo-pagan community has gone from “And harm ye none” and “We are not Satanists” (c.1985) to endorsing, advocating, and supporting a host of publications and organizations are either malefic or openly “Satanic” for either commercial or political reasons (c. 2015-2025).
This collapse of ethics and adherence to the virtues as presented on the Tree of Life, the basis for classical initiation and spiritual progress, can mean only one thing: there will be Hell to pay.
It is unimportant if the editors of Jezebel or even the publishers of the political occult pulp don’t believe that cursing really works. The fact that they ignore the fundamentals of what constitutes a healthy person and healthy society alone is what matters. So, we have what are fundamentally spiritually bankrupt materialists mocking not only the Christian faith of Kirk and wishing him harm – all in good fun we are told – but we also have would-be practitioners going along with it for the ride. And they will be ridden, be sure of that – because either way, the power of the mind – be it materialist based mass suggestions and media manipulation or occult thought forms and the generation of an egregore – will not be abused without consequences.
If we are lucky, we – and that means the esoteric community, publishers, and writers like myself (and that really means my family) – will get through the next two or three years without seeing a “Satanic Panic 2.0.” And be clear, if it happens it will be well founded and deserved. Failure to enforce ethics as a baseline standard for entry into and practice of esotericism is not a strength, it is a profound weakness. The widespread publishing of books on malefic magic, even under the guise of political activism, is not an acceptable excuse. And to be doubly clear, the attempts by some in the esoteric community to have me and others I know “cancelled” (read: defunded) for questioning the official narratives was also a form of malefic magic aimed at purging “the community” of any dissent.
If all goes well we will be ignored, but I doubt it. There will be some blow-back at least on the “witchcraft” end of the spiritual community. I do not expect it to last long, as the news cycle and attention cycle is considerably faster than when “Satanic Panic 1.0” took place.
However, it needs to be clearly understood that the original Satanic Panic was a phenomena born of an unholy alliance of strange bedfellows: aspects of Second Wave Feminism, the emerging Social Work programs on the graduate degree level, Fundamentalist Christians, and cliques within the Roman Catholic Church, all coming together with an irresponsible, ratings (read profit) driven media and government agencies – mainly local law enforcement, schools, and social services – that were underinformed, overwhelmed, and unable to adequately address the problems as they were told to “protect the children.” Be clear, strange things were happening, children were abused (as they had been before and after), but the hysteria of the time prevented an understanding of the reality of child trafficking and sexual abuse. Political and financial agendas dominated the scene, because that was the purpose all along. Any “occult” reality to the events was truly hidden, or rather invisible, but could be seen in the hysteria, emotionalism, dogmatisms, and rush to judgement that dominated the events of the period. It was less by the 1990s when it morphed into the more generalized “anti-Cult Movements” often linked to concerns about Scientology with other spiritual movements and esoteric groups getting swept into the bin at the time. It was and still is a battle between various egregores.
Unfortunately, we are currently looking at the emerging “We are Charlie” movement that is worldwide, well funded, and has a legitimate reason to be “afraid of the midnight hag.” A reason given to it by many in the witchcraft community themselves, either by open action of cursing, or silence in their opposition to it. There is also an unspoken part: it will not simply be white, conservative Christians who start to question the efficacy of malefic magic, as they already believe in it. It will be the middling milquetoast cultural Protestants beginning to wonder if there is something to this “evil thing after all,” along with the host of legal and illegal immigrants that have come to the West in the tens of millions from cultures that already have a conviction in the efficacy of magic in general, and black magic in particular. They will be the potential supporters of the “anti-cult movement” as it unfolds here – a clear reversal of the 1990s when part of the anti-cult movement was to stop the spread of various movements into not only Europe but also Developing Countries.
Then, just for the sake of completeness, we throw in the increased interest over the last decade in folk magic among African Americans (a return to their hoodoo roots so to speak), Native Americans and their various practices, and well just about anybody you want to mention has some form of malefic magical practices in their closet or desk drawer somewhere waiting to be pulled out. How they may respond to its general appearance in wider society is unknown.
That said, how the players for a potential “Satanic Panic 2.0” will line up is not clear to me. It will most likely be a revival of the usual suspects, some of the usual slogans, and there will be unintended consequences that will be ignored. What will be different about this time, is that the New and Emerging Religious Movements, and the neo-pagan, witchcraft, and some related groups will have brought it upon themselves for thirty years of poor choices. Open hostility to the mainstream culture at large (i.e, “the spoon that feeds you”), moving away from practice to having a political litmus test, and with that a near lockstep identification and support of radically Left of center causes and even candidates, all topped off with the very public advocacy and support of magic as a tool to those ends, and if a malefic tool, so much the better.
As one sows, so shall they reap. Fall is here and the Reaper is coming, check your karmic bank balance and get it in the “black” so to speak.
“I well remember it being said to me by an occultist of great experience that two things are necessary for safety in occultism, right motives and right associates.” – Dion Fortune

A few weeks ago, before the assassination of Charlie Kirk, I finished reading Psycic Self Defense by Dion Fortune. And one of the things that stood out to me was her seriousness concerning the subject of witches and black magic.
As many others I have (in school) been led to believe that the medieval witch trials were horrible injustices done to innocent wise women. But it seemed to me that Dion Fortune several times mentioned that it was not so simple.
In Denmark we are told by the Protestant Church that the devil (and witches) does not exist. And to me that has always just illustrated the famous movie quote “The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn’t exist”.
I hope you can comment on Dion Fortune’s remarks since you of course have a much deeper knowledge about this subject.
I am very much aware of the importance of not stoking irrational temperaments in the general public, but if there is something to this I also find it important not to be ignorant of the true history.
To some degree it is cultural, as we see malefic magic in one form in say Ivory Coast or Morocco, but in a different form in Denmark. Possibly the best answer is to re-read Couliano’s “Eros and Magic in the Renaissance” along with Fortune’s “Psychic Self-Defense” topped off with my book on egregores. Someone, somewhere, visible or invisible, is often trying to manipulate someone else (and not for their benefit), somewhere else. That is a simple and direct way of looking at it.
I feel many parallels between Charlie Kirks and Ioan Petru Culianu’s murder. And I hardly buy the main lead given by the FBI investigators in both cases.
Ioan Petru Culianu’s FBI file is unclassified and is professionalism is a joke IMO.
there certainly is an energetic pattern with looking at. Ever notice that if we’re in a generally good mood, the day goes well and everything is fine?
but if in a “bad mood” or if our perception is out of touch with Creation, nothing anybody does seems right?
I posit that we first know ourselves. If we carry around blame and anger and we are not operating in a Filter is Love, all manner of less than Good will spring up from unconsciousness and wreck our experience.
consider this:
Love (ḥūbā) First Century AramaicDefinition:
Love is not merely a feeling; it is the living orientation of the heart and mind. It filters perception, shaping how we experience reality, and guides intention, directing our actions toward wholeness, unity, and harmony.
To “have love” is to embody a state of being that aligns thought, sight, and purpose with compassion and divine order.
Key Aspects:
1. Perception: Love illuminates and harmonizes the way we see and understand the world.
2. Intention: Love steers our motivations and actions toward unity, mercy, and constructive engagement.
3. Being: Love is a continual state — an active presence in the heart — not dependent on external circumstances or fleeting emotion.It softens judgment but in a way but it more realigns a person -mind- to original creation. Without the corruption of negative stress and trauma.
This is powerful. As we use and share this, more and more people will be able to experience healing, as well.
Love as Perception (filter/lens): not just softening judgment but realigning the mind to original creation — like a reset to uncorrupted seeing.
* It restores perception to a pre-trauma, pre-distortion state, where the world and others are seen closer to their true essence.
* Instead of masking, it clears — so the brain doesn’t carry stress-fractured sight but creation-aligned sight.This deepens the metaphor: Love isn’t merely a filter (like sunglasses shading reality) — it’s a recalibrator. It tunes the mind back to its factory setting: perception in harmony with original intention. This means Love, in its Aramaic fullness, functions almost like a neural and spiritual corrective — softening judgment only because it first reestablishes right alignment.
Hello, I am a pagan, and have studied several methods of Witchcraft. I have never seen anything in what I have studied that promoted black magic. Black magic does exist but by far the majority of witches do not use it. Your article implies that all witches are using black magic. Otherwise, your article is well written and thought provoking. Please correct me if I am assessing your writing wrong.
The article does not imply anything, it clear states that: 1) malefic magic has been openly promoted in various neo-pagan oriented media over the last ten or more years; and 2) this is particularly true among the gourmet publishing set and those looking to use magic towards political ends. At no point do I say or imply that “all witches are using black magic” only that nearly, if not all societies have it somewhere in their collective broom closet or altar drawer. Thank you for reading.
An excellent article, thank you, but I think it misses a crucial pivot point. I think we’ve all been missing it until quite recently. This pertains to the resurgence of Extremist-Islamist-Satanic occult order, O9A (Order of Nine Angles), as 764 in the past few years. This backs up your observation that we’re in a similar scenario to the Satanic panic, as O9A got underway in the 60s and peaked in the 80s. What is perhaps being missed is that chaos Magickal tactic (manifesting as hysteria/panic) are serving to veil the inner circle culprits whilst confusing and distracting everyone with upside -down and reflective outer circle activities which don’t quite stack up. All this leads observers further into the Zone of Delusion and Belt of Lies, deepens the chaos and powers the tourbillon that feeds the egregore and keeps the spell in place.
The article is an article, not a book or encyclopedic look at the topic. It is an overview of problems and actions, not a look at specific organizations or individuals within the wider NERM community. As for the O9A, these are accusations that we cannot prove or disprove, and as such, we cannot comment on them.
O9A is probably better known in the UK but 764 originated in the USA, I believe…. Both are still flying under the radar. I can only tell you what I see happening.
Thank you for replying back to me. I probably read more into the article than I should have. Anyways, we live in interesting times. I have read a few of your books and always find them thought provoking.
Something is very odd about this. I had been under the impression that Etsy prohibited the sale of magical services, such as spell casting. But apparently, they have changed their policies for there are all kinds of magical items, books, kits, and services being offered now. I wonder when and why that change was made. In addition, as you would know, serious magical practitioners usually abide by the injunction to keep silent, for magical effectiveness.
So far the only discussion I have seen of this death spell has been in the original article (which I haven’t accessed), a commentary about the article in The Wild Hunt and here. I suspect that Kirk’s organization has o intention of publicizing it. To do so at this point would IMO cost them sympathy by making them seem irrational. “leftists are dangerous because a leftist killed Charlie Kirk with a gun” is a more palatable message to the general public than any suggestion of “leftists killed Charlie with witchcraft.”
However, Megyn Kelly has revealed that Charlie and Erika had seen the Jezebel article and were upset by it. And editors of Jezabel have added a header to the article descrying political violence and claiming it was all a satire. OTH there have been numerous social media comments about the assassination and online celebrations of it referring to the people posting such responses as demonic. It is easy for people who do not believe in actual spirits to dismiss such language as metaphorical, not realizing that for many religious people (and not only Christians) the demonic is a reality. A Satanic Panic 2.0 in which people were persuaded that evil magic was actually effective would be so much worse.
‘who have advocated the use of malefic magic for their specifically “progressive” political ends’
Wait, didn’t you once advocate and instruct using magic to help US troops fight the Iraqis? Do you think just maybe the Iraqis would view THAT as malefic magic for a particular political end?
No, that is a lie that been circulated for some time. If you read the monograph, the instructions were clearly aimed at ‘fighting’ (i.e., transforming) ignorance and emotional states that lead to violence, terrorism, and war. There were no suggestions or statements about fighting people or nations or wishing for specific political or military outcomes, only on changing views. There is significant and clear difference.